IN(TER)DEPENDENCE IN PLATFORMED CREATION

Authors

  • Angele L Christin Stanford University
  • Christopher Persaud University of Southern California, United States of America
  • David Hesmondhalgh University of Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Michael Siciliano Queen's University, Canada
  • Nancy Baym Microsoft Research New England, United States of America
  • Tarleton Gillespie Microsoft Research New England, United States of America
  • Rachel Bergmann Microsoft Research New England, United States of America
  • Raj Bhargava Microsoft Research New England, United States of America
  • Fernando Diaz Google Research, United States of America
  • Elena Maris University of Illinois at Chicago, United States of America

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12094

Keywords:

Platformed creation, cultural production, metrics, algorithms

Abstract

In recent years, a variety of cultural industries have been transformed by platformization – a process in which technology companies serve as intermediaries connecting different parties (most importantly cultural producers and audiences) through websites and applications. From music to book publishing, movie production, and the visual arts, cultural production has undergone massive changes due to platforms such as Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon, Goodreads, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Etsy, etc. In most cultural sectors, creators now have to grapple with the platforms that make their work visible to online audiences. This often means paying close attention to the quantitative infrastructure of platforms, namely their algorithms and analytics, which drive visibility and commercial success. This panel examines what these economic and technological changes imply for the independence of cultural production. Classical studies of culture often emphasized the role that the values of independence and autonomy play in shaping artists’ worldviews and practices. From Bourdieu’s analysis of “fields of cultural production” as “the economic world reversed” to Becker’s theory of “art worlds” where internal dynamics redefine external constraints, or the Frankfurt School’s critical take on the demise of aura through mechanical reproduction, sociological approaches have paid close attention to the threats to independence emerging under modern capitalism. In fact, most classical sociology saw cultural producers in the mass cultural industries as having little independence, often assuming (sometimes without empirical research) that the massification of culture would destroy original and critical art works. Here we revisit the question of independence in the context of platformed creation – a term that embraces all forms of cultural production that are mediated, in part or completely, through digital platforms. By bringing together scholars studying different aspects of platformed creation and reflecting on the concept of independence through diverse disciplinary lenses, we ask: what does independence look like in the context of platformed creation? What are some of the theoretical and methodological tools available to scholars for making sense of cultural, economic, and technological independence in the case of platformed creation? And how do these evolving forms of independence affect the kinds of art works and cultural tropes that circulate online? These different studies aim to put the concept of independence in dialogue with the question of interdependence (among cultural producers, audiences, and platforms) in a mediated digital world.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-15

How to Cite

Christin, A. L., Persaud, C., Hesmondhalgh, D., Siciliano, M., Baym, N., Gillespie, T., Bergmann, R., Bhargava, R., Diaz, F., & Maris, E. (2021). IN(TER)DEPENDENCE IN PLATFORMED CREATION. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12094

Issue

Section

Panels